Physician beliefs about abortion safety and their participation in abortion care.

OBJECTIVE: To document physicians' beliefs about abortion safety and the associations between these beliefs and physician support for, referral for, and participation in abortion care. METHODS: In a 2019 survey at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, we assessed physicians' abortion attitudes, beliefs, and practices (N = 893). We conducted bivariate analyses followed by logistic regression to document relationships between physician beliefs about abortion safety and their support for, referral to, and participation in abortion care. RESULTS: Four-in-five physicians (78%, n = 690) believed that abortion is very or extremely safe. Medical specialty (Obstetrics-Gynecology vs. other; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 10.58, 95% CI: 1.41-79.56), educational exposure to abortion (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.02-2.01), and religiosity (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.85) were associated with physicians' beliefs about the safety of abortion. Providers who believed that abortion was very/extremely safe were more likely to support medication (aOR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.93-4.65) and procedural abortion (aOR = 3.56, 95% CI: 2.31-5.50) and refer patients for abortion care (aOR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.90-5.01). CONCLUSION: Although abortions are associated with extremely few adverse events, a sizable portion of surveyed physicians had incorrect perceptions of the safety of abortion. These beliefs were associated with decreased support and referrals for abortion care. Educational exposure to abortion is associated with more accurate assessments of abortion safety, underscoring the importance of training in this area. Considering the current abortion policy landscape, it is imperative for physicians to hold accurate knowledge about abortion so they can provide comprehensive counseling and, when indicated, referrals for safe and legal care.

Men and women experience different barriers to care seeking for fecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Despite effective treatments for fecal incontinence (FI), FI remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. This study sought to characterize and compare rates of, delays in, experiences with, and barriers to care seeking for FI among men and women. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of electronic survey data collected from adults with FI. The survey included the use of a validated instrument to assess FI severity and questions that now comprise a validated instrument for assessing barriers to care seeking for FI in women. Descriptive analyses characterized differences between men and women. χ2 testing for categorical variables and t-testing for normally distributed continuous variables compared statistical differences. RESULTS: The sample (N = 548) was predominately female (84%), non-Hispanic White (90%), and insured (96%), with a mean Vaizey score (13.4 ± 5.3) consistent with moderate or severe FI. Care seeking rates (p = 0.81) and symptom duration before care seeking (p = 0.23) did not differ between women and men, but women were more likely than men to be told that effective treatments exist; most male and female respondents who sought care were offered treatment. Very few respondents had been asked about FI by a healthcare provider. Whereas normative thinking, limited life impact, and believing that a healthcare provider could not help were more common barriers to care seeking among men, avoidance, fear, and discouragement were more common in women. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women with FI seek care at similar rates and after experiencing symptoms for a similar duration of time. Very few patients with FI have been screened for it by a healthcare provider. Barriers to FI care seeking are different for women and men, and men are less likely than women to be informed about effective treatments by a healthcare provider.

Caring for community members during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a statewide survey.

Aim: Community health workers (CHWs) and home visitors (HVs) are members of the public health workforce who are uniquely poised to support vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we assess the experiences of CHWs and HVs in Wisconsin during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic to learn about their experiences related to mitigation strategies and vaccination efforts. Subject and methods: Working closely with community partners, we recruited CHWs and HVs via email to complete an online survey between June 24 and August 10, 2021. Participants were eligible if they worked at any time since March 25, 2020, when the Safer at Home Order was put into place. The survey asked CHWs and HVs about their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination efforts. Results: Eligible respondents included 48 HVs and 26 CHWs. Most CHWs (96%) and HVs (85%) reported discussing the COVID-19 vaccine with clients, and 46% of HVs and 85% of CHWs said they planned to encourage their clients to vaccinate themselves against COVID-19. We found that many CHWs and HVs identified the COVID-19 pandemic as a threat to the health of the US population, and many reported that they thought mitigation strategies were effective at keeping people safe from COVID-19. There was inconsistency in regard to respondents plans to encourage their clients to receive vaccination for COVID-19. Conclusion: Future study, training, and support for CHWs and HVs should focus on facilitating vaccination efforts and other emerging public health interventions.

Characterizing physician concerns with publicly supporting abortion at Wisconsin's largest medical school.

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with physicians' level of concern and perceived consequences of publicly supporting abortion at Wisconsin's largest and only publicly funded medical school. METHODS: We surveyed physicians at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health about their knowledge, attitudes, and referral practices regarding abortion care. Among those who expressed support for abortion (N = 701), we analyzed perceived concerns about making their support public. RESULTS: Nearly a quarter (22%) of respondents felt very or extremely concerned that taking a strong public stance on abortion would alienate patients and 17% felt very or extremely concerned that doing so would alienate coworkers. More than a quarter (27%) felt very or extremely concerned that publicly supporting abortion would lead to harassment or harm. Those with greater concerns about expressing public support for abortion were comparatively less willing to refer for or participate in abortion care themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Many physicians supportive of abortion reported concerns over publicizing their support for this common health care service. These concerns may render physicians less likely to refer patients for needed abortion care or weigh in on abortion policy.

Difficult Questions With Many Gray Areas: Nuanced Abortion Attitudes Among Physicians.

INTRODUCTION: Abortion is a polarizing social and medical issue, even among physicians. Though the public may expect physicians to hold purely scientific attitudes about abortion, their attitudes and behaviors are just as strongly informed by social and political factors as the public's. In a recent survey study of physicians at an academic medical center about their abortion attitudes, most reported strong support for abortion access. However, more were unwilling to consult in abortion-related cases, and many perceived little or no professional connection to abortion and were reticent to publicly advocate for their position. METHODS: In order to investigate the nuances in physicians' abortion attitudes, we analyzed the open-ended, qualitative responses provided by physicians at the end of a quantitative survey using modified concept mapping procedures and theme generation. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two open-ended responses resulted in 487 data units. We categorized respondents' comments into 2 main groups: attempts to depersonalize, or distance oneself, from abortion and expressions of nuance or ambivalence about abortion. Ambivalence and nuance in abortion attitudes centered around multiple factors that varied from individual to structural. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support previous literature suggesting that physicians' abortion attitudes are not binary and add that nuanced attitudes may be perceived as unwelcome. Acknowledging ambivalence and addressing physicians' tendency to depersonalize abortion could result in more honest, open, and nuanced discourse and contribute to addressing structural issues that result in poor health outcomes, achieving broader reproductive justice goals, and greater access to abortion services.

Willing but unable: Physicians' referral knowledge as barriers to abortion care.

Abortion care is a crucial part of reproductive healthcare. Nevertheless, its availability is constrained by numerous forces, including care referrals within the larger healthcare system. Using a unique study of physician faculty across multiple specialties, we examine the factors associated with doctors' ability to refer patients for abortion care among those who were willing to consult in the care of a patient seeking an abortion (N = 674). Even though they were willing to refer a patient for an abortion, half (53%) of the physicians did not know how and whom to make those referrals, though they care for patients who may need them. Those with the least referral knowledge had not been taught abortion care during their medical training and were in earlier stages of their career than those who had more knowledge. This research exposes another obstacle for those seeking an abortion, a barrier that would be overcome with a clear and robust referral system within and across medical specialties.

Are Wisconsin resident physicians trained in immediate postpartum long acting reversible contraception?

OBJECTIVES: To characterize perceived proficiency in immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) provision among resident physicians in obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine in Wisconsin. STUDY DESIGN: We queried 254 Wisconsin obstetrics and gynecology or family medicine residents about competency and attitudes regarding family planning services via a confidential electronic survey. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the primary outcome of self-reported proficiency in immediate postpartum LARC. RESULTS: We recruited participants from 3 of 3 (100%) obstetrics and gynecology and 9 of 15 (60%) family medicine residency programs, achieving a 74% response rate among trainees (187/254 individuals). Seven of 12 programs (58%) offered immediate postpartum LARC training [100% (3/3) obstetrics and gynecology; 44% (4/9) family medicine]. Forty-eight percent of residents [68% (27/40) obstetrics and gynecology and 60/141 (43%) family medicine, p < 0.01)] reported immediate postpartum LARC proficiency (subdermal implant placement: 48%; immediate postpartum intrauterine device (IUD) placement: 16%). Residents (versus interns), who were younger, training in a program without religious affiliation, and who hoped to provide immediate postpartum LARC provision in practice, were more likely to report subdermal implant proficiency. Interns and family medicine trainees were less likely to report immediate postpartum IUD proficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Only 44% of participating family medicine programs provide immediate postpartum LARC training. Two-thirds of obstetrics and gynecology residents report proficiency in immediate postpartum LARC, compared to fewer than half of family medicine residents. Given that many Wisconsin counties do not have a practicing obstetrician/gynecologist, improving immediate postpartum LARC training among family medicine residents is paramount. IMPLICATIONS: STATEMENT: Family medicine physicians provide a significant portion of obstetric care, especially in rural areas. Family medicine residency programs should be supported to ensure that all trainees are proficient in placing subdermal implants and family physicians planning to provide obstetric care are trained in postpartum IUD placement.

Physician attitudes about abortion and their willingness to consult in abortion care at a Midwestern academic medical center.

OBJECTIVE: To assess abortion-related attitudes, practices, and perceptions among physicians of all specialties at a Wisconsin academic medical center. STUDY DESIGN: We developed and disseminated a cross-sectional web and mail survey to physicians at our academic center using a list generated by Human Resources. We performed descriptive analyses and assessed bivariate relationships between measures of support for abortion, perceived climate of opinion, willingness to consult in abortion-related cases, and sociodemographic and professional characteristics. We used binary logistic regression to model willingness to consult. RESULTS: We sent the survey to 1357 physicians and received 913 (67%) responses. Participants reported strong support for unrestricted access to abortion and the efforts of abortion providers but estimated relatively lower support among peers. Compared to 556 (62%) who reported "a lot" of support for abortion access, only 183 (21%) estimated the same level of support among peers. Similarly, 615 (69%) participants reported "a lot" of support for abortion providers, compared to only 227 (25%) who estimated the same level of support among peers. Participants most commonly estimated that peers "somewhat" support abortion access (381; 43%) and abortion providers (344; 39%). Across specialties, 799 (90%) physicians said they were at least "somewhat" willing to consult in abortion-related cases. Compared to obstetrician-gynecologists and family physicians, other specialists were less likely to be willing to consult (aOR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.65), though majorities of both groups were willing. Physicians who perceived equal or higher support for abortion among peers were more likely to be willing to consult (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.60-2.95). CONCLUSION: Most physicians at our center reported support for abortion; however, those who perceived less support among peers reported less willingness to consult in abortion-related care, regardless of specialty. IMPLICATIONS: Even among physicians who supported abortion, the perception that peers were less supportive deterred participation in abortion-related care at our institution. Where abortion care is isolated or stigmatized, physicians may be unaware of colleagues' true attitudes about abortion. Efforts to normalize communication about abortion care could improve access and quality.

Prenatal care experiences among pregnant women with obesity in Wisconsin, United States: a qualitative quality improvement assessment.

BACKGROUND: Stigma and bias experienced during prenatal care can affect quality of care and, ultimately, the health of pregnant women with obesity and their infants. We sought to 1) better understand the bias and stigma that women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m2 experience while receiving prenatal care, 2) gauge women's interest in group prenatal education for women with obesity, and 3) gather feedback about their preferred weight-related terminology. METHODS: We conducted and thematically content-analyzed 30 semi-structured interviews of women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m2 who received prenatal care at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in the Midwest region of the United States. RESULTS: All women recalled positive experiences during their perinatal care during which they felt listened to and respected by providers. However, many also described a fear of weight-related bias or recalled weight-based discrimination. Women reacted favorably to a proposed group prenatal care option for pregnant women with obesity that focused on nutrition, physical activity, and weight management. Women rated "weight" and "BMI" as the most desirable terms for describing weight, while "large size" and "obesity" were rated least desirable. CONCLUSIONS: Many pregnant women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m2 experience bias in the prenatal care setting. Potential steps to mitigate bias towards weight include improving provider awareness of the experiences and perspectives of this population, expanding prenatal care options targeted towards women with high BMIs, including group care, and using patient-preferred weight-related terminology. Through the remainder of this manuscript, wherever possible, the term "high BMI" will be used in place of the term "obesity" to describe women with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 in order to respect the preferred terminology of the women we interviewed.

After the Randomized Trial: Implementation of Community-Based Continence Promotion in the Real World.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Most women aged 65 and older have incontinence, associated with high healthcare costs, institutionalization, and negative quality of life, but few seek care. Mind over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder (MOM) is a small-group self-management workshop, led by a trained facilitator in a community setting, proven to improve incontinence in older women. DESIGN: We used mixed methods to gather information on the real-world adoption, maintenance, and implementation of MOM by community agencies following a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that tested intervention effects on incontinence. SETTING: Community agencies serving older adults in six Wisconsin communities. PARTICIPANTS: Community agency administrators and facilitators trained to offer MOM for the RCT. MEASUREMENTS: Investigators tracked rates of adoption (offering MOM in the 12 months following the RCT) and maintenance (offering MOM more than once in the next 18 months) in six communities. Individual interviews and focus groups (N = 17) generated qualitative data about barriers and facilitators related to adoption and maintenance. Trained observers assessed implementation fidelity (alignment with program protocol) at 42 MOM sessions. RESULTS: A total of 67% of communities (four of six) adopted MOM, and 50% (three of six) maintained MOM. No implementation fidelity lapses occurred. Facilitators of adoption and maintenance included MOM's well-organized protocol and lean time commitment, sharing of implementation efforts between partner organizations, staff specifically assigned to health promotion activities, and high community interest in continence promotion. Other than stigma associated with incontinence, barriers were similar to those seen with other community-based programs for older adults: limited funding/staffing, competing organizational priorities, challenges identifying/training facilitators, and difficulty engaging community partners/participants. CONCLUSION: Using design for dissemination and community engagement, assessment of implementation outcomes is feasible in conjunction with a clinical RCT. Partner-centered implementation packages can address barriers to adoption and maintenance.

No association between HPV vaccination and infertility in U.S. females 18-33 years old.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have been recommended as primary prevention of HPV-related cancers for over 10 years in the United States, and evidence reveals decreased incidence of HPV infections following vaccination. However, concerns have been raised that HPV vaccines could decrease fertility. This study examined the relationship between HPV immunization and self-reported infertility in a nationally representative sample. METHODS: Data from the 2013-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed to assess likelihood of self-reported infertility among women aged 20 to 33, who were young enough to have been offered HPV vaccines and old enough to have been queried about infertility (n = 1114). Two logistic regression models, stratified by marital history, examined potential associations between HPV vaccination and infertility. Model 1 assessed the likelihood of infertility among women who had never been pregnant or whose pregnancies occurred prior to HPV vaccination. Model 2 accounted for the possibility of latent and/or non-permanent post-vaccine infertility by including all women 20-33 years old who reported any 12-month period of infertility. RESULTS: 8.1% reported any infertility. Neither model revealed any association between HPV vaccination at any age and self-reported infertility, regardless of marital status. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of increased infertility among women who received the HPV vaccine. These results provide further evidence of HPV vaccine safety and should give providers confidence in recommending HPV vaccination. Further research should explore protective effects of HPV vaccines on female and male fertility.

Health Care Barriers to Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Wisconsin.

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC), specifically implants and intrauterine devices (IUD), are highly effective, low maintenance forms of birth control. Practice guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of Family Physicians, and American Academy of Pediatrics recommend that LARC be considered first-line birth control for most women; however, uptake remains low. In this study, we sought to understand practices and barriers to provision of LARC in routine and immediate postpartum settings as they differ between specialties. METHODS: We surveyed 3,000 Wisconsin physicians and advanced-practice providers in obstetrics-gynecology/women's health (Ob-gyn), family medicine, pediatrics, and midwifery to assess practices and barriers (56.5% response rate). This analysis is comprised of contraceptive care providers (n=992); statistical significance was tested using chi-square and 2-sample proportions tests. RESULTS: More providers working Ob-gyn (94.3%) and midwifery (78.7%) were skilled providers of LARC methods than those in family medicine (42.5%) and pediatrics (6.6%) (P < .0001). Lack of insertion skill was the most-cited barrier to routine provision among family medicine (31.1%) and pediatric (72.1%) providers. Among prenatal/delivery providers, over 50% across all specialties reported lack of device availability on-site as a barrier to immediate postpartum LARC provision; organizational practices also were commonly reported barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Gaps in routine and immediate postpartum LARC practice were strongly related to specialty, and providers' experience heightened barriers to immediate postpartum compared to routine insertion. Skills training targeting family medicine and pediatric providers would enable broader access to LARC. Organizational barriers to immediate postpartum LARC provision impact many providers.

If We Don't Ask, They Won't Tell: Screening for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence by Primary Care Providers.

BACKGROUND: More than half of older adults experience urinary (UI) or fecal incontinence (FI), but the majority have never discussed symptoms with health care providers. Little is known about primary care providers' (PCPs') screening for UI and FI. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of PCPs within a Midwest academic institution to ascertain and compare PCPs' beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors regarding screening and treatment for UI and FI; determine factors associated with screening for FI; and identify potential barriers to and facilitators of FI screening and treatment. RESULTS: Among 154 PCPs, the screening rate for UI (75%) was more than double that for FI (35%; P < .001). PCPs believed that both UI and FI screening were important but felt better informed to treat UI (P < .001). Screening for FI was associated with UI screening (OR, 11.27; 95% CI, 4.9-26.0; P < .001); feeling informed to treat FI (OR, 10.21; 95% CI, 1.2-90.0; P = .01); screening verbally (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.9-8.0; P < .001); perceiving screening as important (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.8-7.4; P < .001); using the term, "accidental bowel leakage" (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-6.7; P = .02) or "bowel control issues" (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.5; P = .03); and being a resident (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.82; P = .02). PCPs reported high interest in patient and provider educational materials about UI and FI. CONCLUSIONS: Most PCPs screen for UI but not FI. High reported interest in educational materials, coupled with high reported rates of perceived importance of screening for UI and FI, suggests that PCPs welcome informative interventions to streamline diagnosis and treatment.

Validation of an instrument to assess barriers to care-seeking for accidental bowel leakage in women: the BCABL questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Fewer than 30% of women with accidental bowel leakage (ABL) seek care, despite the existence of effective, minimally invasive therapies. We developed and validated a condition-specific instrument to assess barriers to care-seeking for ABL in women. METHODS: Adult women with ABL completed an electronic survey about condition severity, patient activation, previous care-seeking, and demographics. The Barriers to Care-seeking for Accidental Bowel Leakage (BCABL) instrument contained 42 potential items completed at baseline and again 2 weeks later. Paired t tests evaluated test-retest reliability. Factor analysis evaluated factor structure and guided item retention. Cronbach's alpha evaluated internal consistency. Within and across factor item means generated a summary BCABL score used to evaluate scale validity with six external criterion measures. RESULTS: Among 1,677 click-throughs, 736 (44%) entered the survey; 95% of eligible female respondents (427 out of 458) provided complete data. Fifty-three percent of respondents had previously sought care for their ABL; median age was 62 years (range 27-89); mean Vaizey score was 12.8 (SD = 5.0), indicating moderate to severe ABL. Test-retest reliability was excellent for all items. Factor extraction via oblique rotation resulted in the final structure of 16 items in six domains, within which internal consistency was high. All six external criterion measures correlated significantly with BCABL score. CONCLUSIONS: The BCABL questionnaire, with 16 items mapping to six domains, has excellent criterion validity and test-retest reliability when administered electronically in women with ABL. The BCABL can be used to identify care-seeking barriers for ABL in different populations, inform targeted interventions, and measure their effectiveness.